In November 2000, India witnessed the birth of three new states: Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh. Carved out of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh respectively, these states were envisioned to foster more focused governance, accelerate economic development, and address regional aspirations. Over the past two decades, their growth trajectories have been diverse, offering valuable insights into state-led development in India. This blog post delves into a detailed comparison of their economic expansion, per capita income, poverty reduction efforts, sectoral contributions, and Human Development Index (HDI) trends, drawing insights from NITI Aayog and other key reports.
The Economic Powerhouse: GSDP Growth Trajectories
The Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) serves as a primary indicator of a state’s overall economic health. Since their inception, all three states have demonstrated significant growth, but with varying paces.
Uttarakhand has consistently emerged as a frontrunner in economic expansion. Its economy impressively grew 24 times, from ₹14,501 crore in 2000 to ₹3,46,000 crore in 2023-24. This rapid growth, significantly outpacing both Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh, highlights its robust growth trajectory. The state’s real GSDP saw a remarkable Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 13.7% between FY 2005 and FY2012, driven largely by its burgeoning tourism industry and service sector.
Chhattisgarh has also shown substantial progress, with its economy expanding 17 times since 2000. It recorded an average annual GSDP growth rate of approximately 14.13% until 2020-21, close to the national average. The state’s economy, valued at ₹5.09 lakh crore (US$60 billion) in 2023–24, benefits significantly from its rich mineral resources and developing industrial base.
Jharkhand, while experiencing growth, has lagged behind its counterparts. Its economy expanded 13 times in the same period, with its real GSDP growing at an average rate of 5.1% between 2012-13 and 2021-22, which was lower than the national average. Despite this, recent years show an improving trend, with real GSDP increasing at an average annual rate of 8.8% between 2020-21 and 2022-23. The state’s heavy reliance on mineral resources and industries like coking coal and uranium remain central to its economy.
Per Capita Income: Reflecting Individual Prosperity
Beyond aggregate economic size, per capita income offers a crucial lens into the financial well-being and quality of life for citizens within a state. Here, Uttarakhand once again leads the pack.
Uttarakhand’s per capita income has soared from ₹15,285 in 2000 to an impressive ₹2.60 lakh in 2023-24, a 17-fold increase and notably higher than the national average of ₹2.12 lakh. This significant rise indicates improving living standards and economic opportunities for its residents. The projected per capita income for FY 2024-25 is ₹2.74 lakh, demonstrating continued upward momentum in economic indicators.
Chhattisgarh’s per capita income has also seen substantial growth, from ₹12,170 at its formation to ₹147,361 by 2023-24. While a strong improvement, its nominal per capita income in 2021-22 was still 20% lower than the national average, indicating room for further enhancement in inclusive growth.
Jharkhand’s per capita income started at ₹11,034 and reached ₹105,274 by 2023-24. Despite this increase, it remains considerably lower than both Uttarakhand and Chhattisgarh, and is about 50% of the national per capita income as of 2021-22. This highlights persistent economic disparities within the region and the need for targeted sustainable development initiatives.
Tackling Poverty: A Collective Endeavor
Poverty reduction is a critical aspect of human capital development. All three states, especially with the strategic guidance of NITI Aayog’s Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), have made strides in lifting their populations out of poverty.
Uttarakhand has demonstrated remarkable success in poverty alleviation, experiencing one of the most rapid reductions nationally after 2005. Its multidimensional poverty rate plummeted by 8% between 2015-16 and 2019-21, from 17.67% to 9.67%, meaning over 800,000 people escaped poverty. This progress in both rural and urban areas reflects effective implementation of social welfare programs and economic opportunities.
Chhattisgarh has also achieved significant milestones in poverty alleviation, nearly halving its multidimensional poverty rate from 70% in 2005-06 to 37% by 2015-16, pulling 7 million people out of poverty. The NITI Aayog’s 2023 report, based on NFHS 2019-21 data, shows a further decrease to 19.37%. While still higher than the national average, this is a testament to focused efforts in public policy and community development.
Jharkhand, unfortunately, still contends with some of the highest poverty rates in India. While it saw rapid reduction between 1994 and 2005, its pace slowed thereafter. The state’s multidimensional poverty index (MPI) was reported as 42.16% in 2015-16, ranking it among the poorest states. However, recent data (NFHS 2019-21) indicates a promising 50% drop in MPI poor from 47.13% in 2013-14 to an extrapolated 23.34% in 2022-23, signaling renewed efforts towards inclusive growth and a stronger focus on sustainable development goals.
Sectoral Contributions: Shifting Economic Landscapes
The structure of an economy, defined by the sectoral contribution to GSDP from agriculture (primary), industry (secondary), and services (tertiary), provides critical insights into economic diversification and maturity.
In Uttarakhand, there’s been a clear shift away from the primary sector. Its contribution to GSDP decreased from 31.22% in 1999-00 to 22.24% in 2005-06, while the secondary sector tripled and the tertiary sector doubled in contribution. By 2023-24, the services sector is projected to contribute 47%, industry 43%, and agriculture 10% to the GSDP. This shift underscores the growing importance of the service sector, particularly tourism, which increased its GSDP contribution from 37% to 43.7% in 2023-24.
Jharkhand’s economy remains significantly influenced by its industrial sector, heavily dependent on mineral resources. In 2021-22, the services sector was the largest contributor to its Gross State Value Added (GSVA) with 43.4%, followed closely by Industry (38.2%), and agriculture (18.2%). Historically, the primary sector, including agriculture and mining, saw a decline to 23.30% of GSDP by 2020-21, indicating a move towards secondary and tertiary activities, though industrial growth remains a core driver.
Chhattisgarh’s economy also shows a strong industrial base, being the largest contributor to its GSVA with a 42.4% share in 2021-22, followed by services (35.4%) and agriculture (22.2%). The state is rich in mineral wealth, which has underpinned much of its industrial output. While manufacturing has grown, the state is looking to further diversify its economy beyond coal and mining into IT and other service sectors for future growth.
Human Development Index: A Holistic View of Progress
The Human Development Index (HDI) offers a holistic perspective, measuring progress in health, education, and living standards. All three new states, as part of India’s broader development journey, have shown improvements in their HDI since 2000.
Uttarakhand’s HDI has shown a positive upward trend. After a period of stagnation pre-2000, its HDI improved from 0.621 in 2000 to 0.650 by 2005, reflecting increased governmental focus. By 2022, Uttarakhand reached an HDI of 0.713, placing it in the “High Human Development” category. This consistent improvement highlights the success of public health initiatives and educational reforms, though regional disparities, especially in remote hilly areas, persist.
Chhattisgarh’s HDI has also demonstrated significant progress, rising from 0.334 in 1993-94 to 0.589 in 2020-21. This indicates balanced improvements across all three dimensions. Its Education Index rose commendably, reflecting better access and outcomes, while the Income Index also saw a substantial increase. Despite overall improvements, disparities in health performance between districts have been noted, a key area for targeted social development interventions.
Jharkhand, while making progress, has historically lagged in several social development indicators. Its per capita income remains lower than the national average, and it has battled high poverty rates. However, there have been notable improvements in literacy rates, with a 14.1% increase between 2001 and 2011. Significant efforts are underway to boost its Human Capital Development, aiming to reduce intra-state disparities and improve core social indicators. While a direct, comparable HDI value for recent years for Jharkhand isn’t consistently available in the provided data, the overall improvements in economic and poverty metrics suggest an upward trajectory in its HDI as well.
Conclusion: A Journey of Development and Future Prospects
The 23-year journey of Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh since their formation in November 2000 paints a compelling picture of regional development in India. While all three states have achieved substantial economic growth and improvements in social indicators, their paths have diverged. Uttarakhand has emerged as a clear leader in overall economic expansion and per capita income growth, driven by its thriving service sector and strategic investments. Chhattisgarh has leveraged its mineral wealth to achieve significant GSDP growth and remarkable poverty reduction. Jharkhand, despite facing greater challenges, is demonstrating encouraging signs of progress in recent years, particularly in reducing multidimensional poverty and boosting industrial growth.
The lessons learned from these states emphasize the importance of tailored public policy, economic diversification, and continuous investment in human capital development to foster sustainable development and address existing economic disparities. As India continues its journey towards becoming a global economic powerhouse, the growth stories of these states will remain crucial blueprints for future state-led development initiatives, focusing on inclusive growth for all citizens.
About the Author
