Pakistan’s Response and Legal Actions
The controversy surrounding Salman Khan being declared a terrorist by Pakistan originated from his remarks at the Joy Forum 2025 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. During his speech, Salman Khan referred to Balochistan as a separate entity from Pakistan while discussing India’s influence in global cinema and politics. This remark triggered a strong backlash from Pakistani authorities who consider Balochistan an integral part of Pakistan’s territory.
Key Details of the Controversy:
- Salman Khan’s Comment: At the forum, Salman Khan mentioned Balochistan independently during a segment highlighting regional identities, which Pakistan interpreted as supporting Baloch separatism. This was seen by Pakistan as a violation of their sovereignty and territorial integrity.
- Pakistan’s Reaction: The Pakistani government swiftly condemned the statement, alleging it promoted separatism and threatened national security. Pakistan’s Ministry of Interior declared Salman Khan a “terrorist” under the Fourth Schedule of Pakistan’s 1997 Anti-Terrorism Act, a classification typically reserved for persons suspected of terrorism-related activities.
- Baloch Separatists’ Response: Some leaders of the Baloch separatist movement praised Salman Khan for acknowledging their cause, interpreting his remarks as a form of international recognition and support.
- Broader Diplomatic Impact: The incident has escalated diplomatic tensions between India and Pakistan, adding to the already strained relations fueled by other political and territorial disputes.
- Media and Public Reactions: The controversy has generated widespread coverage and debate across Indian, Pakistani, and international media, with polarized opinions on Salman Khan’s intent and the repercussions of his statement.
This controversy is part of the larger, long-standing geopolitical conflict involving Balochistan, India, and Pakistan, where issues of sovereignty, national identity, and regional autonomy remain highly sensitive. Salman Khan’s comments inadvertently brought this contentious subject to the forefront, leading to significant diplomatic aftermath and public discourse.
About the Author
