This blog post details a landmark ruling by a Bangladesh court on November 17, 2025, sentencing former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to death in absentia for crimes against humanity. The conviction stems from a brutal crackdown on student-led protests in mid-2024, leading to profound political uncertainty for the former leader, who is currently in exile in India. The post explores the conviction’s specifics, the 2024 student uprising, Hasina’s flight, international reactions, and the implications for upcoming Bangladesh elections and the nation’s political future.
The Historic Verdict: Crimes Against Humanity
The International Crimes Tribunal-1 (ICT-1) in Dhaka delivered a historic verdict on November 17, 2025, convicting Sheikh Hasina, the 78-year-old former Prime Minister, and sentencing her to death in absentia. The charges included three counts related to her role in suppressing the July Revolution of 2024, specifically ordering killings, preventing justice, and failing to stop punitive actions against protesting students. The tribunal found that Hasina, as the “superior commander,” authorized the use of drones, helicopters, and lethal weapons against student demonstrators. This marks a monumental moment, holding a former head of government accountable for alleged severe human rights abuses.
- Convicting Body: International Crimes Tribunal-1 (ICT-1) in Dhaka.
- Date of Verdict: November 17, 2025.
- Convicted Individual: Sheikh Hasina, former Prime Minister (78 years old).
- Sentence: Death in absentia.
- Charges: Three counts related to her role in suppressing the July Revolution of 2024, including ordering killings, preventing justice, and failing to stop punitive actions against protesting students.
- Tribunal’s Finding: Hasina, as the “superior commander,” authorized the use of drones, helicopters, and lethal weapons against student demonstrators.
- Significance: A monumental moment holding a former head of government accountable for alleged severe human rights abuses.
The Genesis of Discontent: Bangladesh’s Student Uprising of 2024
The widespread student-led uprising in July and August 2024, also known as the July Revolution or Student-People’s Uprising, ultimately led to the end of Hasina’s 15-year rule. The initial spark was the reinstatement of a controversial public sector job quota system by the Bangladesh Supreme Court, reserving 56% of government jobs for specific categories.
The situation escalated when Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina compared student protesters to “Razakars” (collaborators during the 1971 Liberation War), causing widespread outrage. This was met with a violent crackdown by security forces and the ruling Awami League’s student wing, resulting in numerous deaths and injuries. The movement quickly broadened beyond quota reform to include demands for Hasina’s resignation and accountability for the violence. Underlying grievances included accusations of authoritarianism, economic depression, high youth unemployment, soaring inflation, and rampant corruption.
- Event: Widespread student-led uprising in July and August 2024, also known as the July Revolution or Student-People’s Uprising.
- Outcome: Led to the end of Hasina’s 15-year rule.
- Initial Spark: Reinstatement of a controversial public sector job quota system by the Bangladesh Supreme Court, reserving 56% of government jobs for specific categories.
- Escalation: Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina compared student protesters to “Razakars” (collaborators during the 1971 Liberation War), causing widespread outrage.
- Government Response: Violent crackdown by security forces and the ruling Awami League’s student wing, resulting in numerous deaths and injuries.
- Broadened Demands: Movement expanded beyond quota reform to include Hasina’s resignation and accountability for violence.
- Underlying Grievances: Accusations of authoritarianism, economic depression, high youth unemployment, soaring inflation, and rampant corruption.
From Crackdown to Ouster: Hasina’s Fall from Power
The government’s initial response to the protests was defiance and harsh repression. An estimated 1,400 deaths occurred due to actions by police, army, and paramilitary forces. Drastic measures were implemented, including university closures, dormitory evacuations, a nationwide curfew, and a widespread internet shutdown to control information. Key protest coordinators and opposition figures were also detained.
Despite the Supreme Court’s concession to abolish most civil service quotas on July 21, it was too late to quell the unrest. The movement’s primary demand had shifted to Sheikh Hasina’s resignation. Following a non-cooperation movement and a “Long March to Dhaka,” Hasina resigned on August 5, 2024, and fled to India. An interim government was subsequently established, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, tasked with restoring stability and preparing for fresh elections.
- Government’s Initial Response: Defiance and harsh repression of protests.
- Violent Suppression: Estimated 1,400 deaths due to actions by police, army, and paramilitary forces.
- Drastic Measures: University closures, dormitory evacuations, nationwide curfew, and a widespread internet shutdown to control information.
- Detentions: Key protest coordinators and opposition figures were detained.
- Supreme Court Concession: Abolition of most civil service quotas on July 21, but it was too late.
- Shift in Demand: Movement’s primary demand became Sheikh Hasina’s resignation.
- Hasina’s Resignation: August 5, 2024, following a non-cooperation movement and a “Long March to Dhaka.”
- Flight to Exile: Hasina fled to India.
- Interim Government: Established, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, tasked with restoring stability and preparing for fresh elections.
Exile in India and the Extradition Dilemma
Sheikh Hasina currently resides in exile in India, in a guarded home in central Delhi provided by the Indian government. India extended her visa for “safety reasons” but has avoided granting formal political asylum, describing it as a “purely technical” measure.
Bangladesh’s interim government formally requested her extradition in December 2024, citing charges of crimes against humanity, corruption, and other offenses. However, India has yet to provide a formal response. Experts suggest that India-Bangladesh relations and political exception clauses in the extradition treaty make her return unlikely, potentially due to perceived political motivations behind the charges. India’s lack of a clear refugee policy allows for flexibility in such cases. Hasina, for her part, denies all charges and states she would only return if free, fair, and participatory elections are held.
- Hasina’s Location: Exile in India, residing in a guarded home in central Delhi provided by the Indian government.
- Visa Status: India extended her visa for “safety reasons” but avoided granting formal political asylum, calling it a “purely technical” measure.
- Extradition Request: Bangladesh’s interim government formally requested her extradition in December 2024.
- Charges in Bangladesh: Crimes against humanity, corruption, and other offenses.
- India’s Response: No formal response to extradition requests yet.
- Expert Opinion: India-Bangladesh relations and political exception clauses in the extradition treaty make her return unlikely, potentially due to perceived political motivations behind the charges.
- India’s Policy: India lacks a clear refugee policy, allowing flexibility.
- Hasina’s Stance: Denies all charges and states she would only return if free, fair, and participatory elections are held.
International Scrutiny and Calls for Accountability
The international community is closely monitoring events in Bangladesh, raising concerns over human rights abuses during the 2024 student uprising and the fairness of Sheikh Hasina’s conviction. Organizations like the United Nations, European Union, and Amnesty International have condemned the excessive force, mass arrests, arbitrary detentions, and enforced disappearances. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk described the actions as a “calculated and well-coordinated strategy… to hold onto power.”
- International Monitoring: Close monitoring of events by the international community.
- Concerns Raised: Over human rights abuses during the 2024 student uprising and the fairness of Sheikh Hasina’s conviction.
- Condemnations: By organizations like the United Nations, European Union, and Amnesty International regarding excessive force, mass arrests, arbitrary detentions, and enforced disappearances.
- UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk’s Statement: Described actions as a “calculated and well-coordinated strategy… to hold onto power.”
- Reported Abuses: Torture, suppression of free speech, attacks on journalists, and sexual violence against female protesters.
- Concerns about Tribunal Impartiality: Highlighted by human rights groups, despite some reforms to the International Crimes Tribunal.
- Hasina’s Denunciation: Calls the verdict “biased, politically motivated,” arguing the tribunal lacks democratic mandate and targets her party.
- Global Focus: Ensuring justice and upholding international legal standards in Bangladesh.
The Road Ahead: Bangladesh’s Political Crossroads
With Sheikh Hasina’s conviction and the Awami League’s ban from upcoming national elections, Bangladesh faces a critical juncture. The interim government, led by Muhammad Yunus, is steering the nation towards parliamentary elections slated for early February 2026, alongside a constitutional referendum. Yunus has affirmed his intention not to seek political office, aiming for a smooth democratic transition.
However, the ban on the Awami League has sparked protests and raised questions about election legitimacy, given the party’s historical significance and strength. While some Awami League leaders remain hopeful for a comeback, the International Crisis Group suggests Sheikh Hasina’s political comeback is “very slim” if she maintains control. The nation faces significant challenges in managing dissent, tackling deep-seated corruption, and navigating external pressures. The upcoming period will be a key test for forging a stable, democratic future amidst profound political uncertainty.
- Current Situation: Sheikh Hasina’s conviction and the Awami League’s ban from upcoming national elections.
- Interim Government: Led by Muhammad Yunus, steering the nation towards parliamentary elections.
- Election Timeline: Slated for early February 2026, alongside a constitutional referendum.
- Yunus’s Stance: Affirmed intention not to seek political office, aiming for a smooth democratic transition.
- Concerns about Election Legitimacy: Ban on the Awami League has sparked protests and raised questions, given the party’s significance and strength.
- Awami League Outlook: Some leaders hopeful for a comeback, but International Crisis Group suggests Sheikh Hasina’s political comeback is “very slim” if she maintains control.
- National Challenges: Managing dissent, tackling deep-seated corruption, and navigating external pressures.
- Key Test: Forging a stable, democratic future amidst profound political uncertainty.
An Uncertain Future for a Political Titan
The Bangladesh court’s death sentence for Sheikh Hasina on crimes against humanity marks an unprecedented event. Currently in forced exile in India, her future remains deeply precarious and shrouded in political uncertainty, despite the interim government’s persistent calls for her extradition. The fallout from the 2024 student uprising, ongoing debates over justice, human rights abuses, and the upcoming Bangladesh elections will continue to shape her fate and Bangladesh’s fragile democracy. The world watches as Bangladesh navigates its path toward accountability and a potentially new political order.
About the Author
